Today Sept 1st – help Louisiana pets

September 1, 2009

End the gassing of Louisiana Shelter Pets!

It is fast and easy to do; just write a quick message to a few people asking them to put an end to the killing of pets in gas chambers in Louisiana. All the info you need is right on this web page:

End Gas Chambers for Shelter Pets in Louisiana – http://tangiadoptarescue.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/end-gas-chambers-for-shelter-pets-in-louisiana/

Here is another sample letter that you may base your letter on:

Ban the gassing of pets in Louisiana – http://tangiadoptarescue.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/ban-gassing-pets-louisiana/

Phone calls are more effective so please also consider make a few quick phone calls.

NOTE: please do this with love in your hearts for these homeless animals. Love is more powerful than hate or anger.

If our shelter pets must die let it be in a more humane way.

Please pass this along and post it everywhere! Myspace, facebook, twitter, blogs, websites, local media! Together we can make a difference. Please take action today!

No more gassing of pets!

No more gassing of pets!


182 killed and no investigation

November 23, 2008

No outside investigation on mass killing at the Hammond animal shelter

On August 4, 2008 animal control killed 170-204 or so animals (seems no one knows the true number), yet to this date, not a single credible investigation (that I know of) has been conducted. Is this because the Tangipahoa parish residences’ are so insensitive and uncaring that the killing of this large number of companion animals didn’t raise red flags and demand of an independent investigation? Was there no investigation because killing hundreds of animals is too common in animal shelters?

But about 200 people showed up at the following parish council meeting to demand answers and justice for the animals killed. The media also thought that it was worth reporting and produce multiple news reports concerning the August 4th incident.

Yet, the only investigation (1) conducted was by the parish hired parish attorney. Since when are attorneys trained to investigate possible criminal crimes (as many people feel laws were broken)? And since it was the top parish leader, Parish President, Gordon Burgess, himself who gave the final OK for the killings, wouldn’t that be like him investigating himself? Well we are in Louisiana, the state know for corruption, so self investigation may not be that unusual.

Was there no suspicion of wrongdoing? Let’s see…

The why: the parish’s reason for the killings…

The media reports go from naming a mystery air borne viral infection, then maybe it is the corona virus that demands complete destruction of all animals in the shelter. Then finally in the so called, ‘official report‘ by the parish attorney, Glen Galbraith, salmonella is named as one of the possible diseases.

Yet, not one test was taken to diagnose the deadly disease, even with the media quoting Burgess as saying, “This is very serious. It could be affecting your pet at home”, “We’re investigating it“, and that Burgess ordered tests.

How does one “investigate the disease” without taking one single test? And how does one “identify the disease” when all the animals are dumped in a landfill – not one body sent anywhere for testing?

Note that the links above go to a news reports posted on August 6, 2008 – after the killings – did Burgess not get the info from the experts on August 4th about it costing too much and taking too much time to test, as written later in the ‘shelter report‘ by the parish attorney, Glen Galbraith? Come now, doesn’t all this story changing smell a little like a cover up to you? From what I heard people saying at the meeting with HSUS about TPAC I am not the only one doubtful that disease caused the mass killing.

Also take not that not one dog nor cat that made it out of that shelter alive on August 4th came down with any deadly diseases – that the parish would have your believe mandated the destruction of the whole shelter population (2). And if they really believed both animals and humans were in danger, as quoted in the media (3), then why were any animals allowed to leave the facility? I am not the only one asking this question: “Was it necessary to kill everything or at all, including those who just came in? Why were some animals taken out, if they were contagious?” Leavy demands.

The real why? Some people’s guesses…

I don’t know, but I have heard people say that they believe that the parish wanted to get rid of some shelter employees and the mass killing was a way to make them quit. Sounds rather drastic – why not just fire them? But people did quit and they were are the ones that many animal rescuers and shelter volunteers said were the ones that cared the most about the animals. Other people think that the shelter needed some repairs and it would just be easier to do with no animals and the shelter closed – killed for convince.

Humane killings? How?

170-204 or so animals, at the shelter on August 4th were examined and diagnosed by not one but two different veterinarians, parish officials were contacted, and two more experts consulted for their opinion, at which time the all the animals in the shelter were ordered to be killed. Only one veterinarian, Doctor Thomas L. Hulsey, working with one vet assistant killed all the animals. The total time span from start to finish: 3-4 hours; which equals to about a minute to a minute and a half per animal!

Ask any doctor, veterinarian, nurse, or anyone else that has ever given a shot or taken a blood sample if they can picture themselves moving this fast, through this large a number (in the high heat of August), and do what has to be done humanely. The ones that would answer us (though not publicly) said that it could not be humanely done at this speed.

Some other questions that come to my mind (and others) are… How did Doctor Hulsey know to bring with him enough of the chemical solution to kill the whole shelter population before he even examined the first animal? Why did Hulsey use his chemical solution and not the shelter’s? And doesn’t seem wrong to have the same vet that profits from each animal killed (the more the bigger his pay check) to make the diagnose? Isn’t that a conflict of interest?

Missing Records

The parish broke the law when they didn’t did not release all the public records on TPAC that were requested. We were also told by the parish that some records that TPAC is required to keep were thrown out on or after August 4th. The Advocate had requested veterinary records, including medical tests. Galbraith said there are no such records. No media has reported the parish braking the public records law. Do the innocent go out their way to lose/dump/destroy records?

Yet No Outside Investigation – Why not?

Not by the local sheriff’s department, not by the local humane society or the state humane society (who promised a investigation), not by the state’s veterinarian association, not by the United States Humane Society – HSUS (they are doing an evaluation, not a investigation), or by any other group, society, or association.

Anyone else outraged?

Does anyone else find this strange and outrageous. If it was children killed that day instead of animals I’m sure the story would be completely different. Even the some of the media found the findings of the official report mysterious. So how many animals deaths does it take, under how many questionable circumstances, before someone is willing to investigate? Don’t the people of Tangi deserve better than a mysterious parish report?

Some people are saying, “move on, you cannot bring back dead animals”. But if we do nothing about what happened on August 4th what is to prevent it from happening again? I know that TPAC has a new director and I do hope he is a good one and will make positive changes. But I and others want something in place to give us conference that another mass killing can never take place at this shelter no matter who is running it.

Media References:

(1)…parish is now conducting their own investigation
http://www.wwltv.com/local/northshore/stories/wwl080508mldogs.1b665c77.html
http://snipurl.com/3bje9

(2)…veterinarian checked out the nine dogs [the ones saved/adopted on August 4th} on Tuesday evening, and was told all were free from serious illness…
http://www.wwltv.com/local/northshore/stories/wwl080508mldogs.1b665c77.html
http://snipurl.com/3bje9

(3)…”Due to a disease outbreak in the animal population at the shelter, it has become necessary to quarantine and totally decontaminate the entire premises to further insure the welfare of the animals and their handlers,” was the statement issued by parish government Monday afternoon… …Employees are encouraged to wear clean uniforms in addition to gloves and masks….
http://www.hammondstar.com/articles/2008/08/05/community/health/9510.txt
http://snipurl.com/3b7wu

Tangipahoa Parish Shelter report

Other blog postings on the mass killing of Aug. 4th…
Tangipahoa Parish Animal Shelter News
Investion to open on the mass shelter killing


Starving Dogs found in Kentwood pound again

November 7, 2008

Once again starving dogs have been found in the Kentwood Dog Pound

Back around the time of 9 – 11, news broke out that the Kentwood city dog pound was allowing dogs to starve to death. Photos were taken of dogs and puppies feeding on the dead bodies of their kennel mates.

Catahoula puppy

Catahoula Pup

Well it looks like they are up to the same animal abuse once again. Is this what they feel is the best way to handle animal control issues? Below is the faxed letter that The Humane Society of Louisiana sent to Kentwood city Mayor on the latest dogs starving incident

November 6, 2008

The Honorable Harold Smith
Mayor, Town of Kentwood
RE: Town of Kentwood Dog Pound
BY FAX TRANSMITTAL

Dear Mayor Smith,

For the past twenty years, since our group’s inception, our representatives have visited and inspected municipal and parish animal sheltering facilities, to ensure that all humane laws and regulations are being upheld and that impounded animals are humanely treated and housed. These inspection services are listed in our original state charter, which is on file with the Office of the Secretary of State. On Thursday, October 30, our representative, Ms. Dawn Taylor-Church, visited your facility and submitted her report and photos for our review.

On October 31, two other representatives, Mr. and Mrs. Randy Stegall, also visited the shelter to adopt out two Catahoula puppies. Our two teams, working independently, were appalled at the conditions they witnessed and concluded that this shelter is simply unfit to humanely house animals and should be closed immediately, due to flaws and structural deficiencies in its design.

The shelter, which apparently was built as a small jail or holding facility some twenty or thirty years ago, according to a city worker, was never designed to house animals. There are no drainage pipes nor a septic system to carry away the animal waste. The waste is simply hosed off to the side of the concrete slab, where it has remained for many, many years. Because the waste has not and cannot be properly removed, the animals are exposed to years of contamination, disease-laden bacteria, and stench. This is no way to humanely house an animal at this facility.

Unfortunately, the report reveals many more serious problems. The dog runs are dank, stink, and usually wet. The two puppies we rescued from this facility on October 31, were barely alive. They were lethargic and extremely ill, after being housed in this facility. If they somehow were sick when they were placed in this shelter, this is no place for them to recover from their illnesses. The puppies were malnourished, their bones and rib bones were protruding, and they were so weak, they could hardly walk. A veterinary report showed that they were suffering from malnutrition. It appears that puppies at this shelter, are only given low-grade, cheap adult dog food, which they are not able to digest at their young age. They were ravenous during the first few days of eating proper puppy food.

In addition, the adoption program, if one exists, violates the state statue on this matter. An adoption agency must conform and abide by the state regulations, which are outlined in La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §3. 2471. Every adoption agency, which includes the town of Kentwood Animal Shelter, must provide a written contract to each adopting individual. That individual is then bound to sterilize this dog within 30 days. No such arrangement exists at your facility. In fact, the facts stated by your shelter employee, Mr. David Sellers, run counter to the statements you made to our shelter inspector, when you said that adopters must pay a $75.00 fee, of which $50.00 is returned once proof of a rabies certificate has been presented to the city. Mr. Sellers simply stated that he gives some of the dogs away to his family and friends – which is a very poor adoption process and is prohibited, when done in this fashion, by state law.

Access to this shelter also runs counter to industry standards. It is very hard for the public to gain access to this facility. Several people, over the last several years, gave up during the process, because calls were never returned and arrangements were never made to meet residents at the shelter. Fees, emergency phone numbers, and hours of operation should have been posted outside of this facility, which, apparently, also has no signage, years ago. We also assume that this facility does not have an operational manual, up-to-date records (since no records were taken during our adoption of the two puppies, we can assume that no accurate records have been kept for years), or works with any rescue groups on placing these animals.

Our second team of inspectors said that this is the worst facility that they had ever seen and referred to it as a “dungeon,” with no chance for the animals to be properly cared for. In light of these statements and documentation, it appears that this facility is violating your city’s own local ordinance under, Section 8-3007: Public dog shelter.

“The town shall maintain a public dog shelter, managed humanely and in a sanitary condition and shall provide food and shelter for any animal impounded.”

Based on our documentation of these unacceptable conditions, we highly recommend that your office immediately issues a moratorium on picking up or housing animals at this facility, until it can be renovated and upgraded and/or demolished. In the interim, you may wish to house impounded animals at a local veterinary clinic (since some of your reports show that only twenty-some animals are picked up per year), or picked up and delivered to the parish facility, located in Hammond. Or, maybe a citizen is willing to sign a joint-cooperative agreement with your town to provide backyard kennel space until the dogs are reclaimed, adopted, or euthanized.

To familiarize you with some of the regulations that apply to municipal animal shelters, I am enclosing copies of Title 3, of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture Code, which are found under section 2463, entitled “General Shelter Standards.” I am also attaching a copy of our inspection report, dated October 30th of this year.

I look forward to speaking with you about the issues outlined in this correspondence, and I hope that we can work amicably together in finding a viable solution to these problems.

Sincerely yours,

Jeff Dorson
Executive Director
The Humane Society of Louisiana
JND/jd
Enclosures: Inspection report
Title 3

—-

CALL for action…

Please phone and/or write…

The Honorable Harold Smith
Mayor, Town of Kentwood
RE: Town of Kentwood Dog Pound
Kentwood City Hall
308 Avenue G
Kentwood, Louisiana 70444
985-229-3451

Sate that they should to close their dog pound or follow the Louisiana state laws. If you are a resident of Kentwood, Louisiana let them know that and also state that you desire to live in a town that cares about animal welfare!

City Leaders to blame

It is alway the leaders that hold the true blame for horror stories like this. They are the ones that put the people in place that run the animal shelters or dog pounds. They are the ones that should be watching out for what is happening under their noses. They are ones to hold accountable when time after time their hired people do wrong.

Here is a little info on Kentwood Louisiana

Kentwood is a rural town in Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana near the Mississippi border. The population was 2,205 at the 2000 census. Water from Kentwood is bottled and popularly marketed in New Orleans under the Kentwood Springs label. Kentwood is best known as the hometown of pop singer Britney Spears and sister Jamie Lynn Spears.

Help the two puppies

The two puppies are in foster care in Metairie. If you are interested in helping (donations/fostering/adopting) the two starving puppies saved from this dog pound please contact…

The Humane Society of Louisiana
P.O. Box 740321, New Orleans, LA 70174
Donate Online.
The Humane Society of Louisiana is a 501(c)3 charitable organization.
Gifts are deductible to the fullest extent allowed by law.


Bloody Louisiana Dog fighters go free

October 18, 2008

Influential dogfighters cleared of all charges

Here we go again, the good old boys, teaming up and the animals die!

I afraid to check my email anymore… dog fighting is against Louisiana law, but the dogs fighters still go free.

10/17/08: Update – Louisiana Dogfight Thugs Cleared Of All Charges

FOR A FORMATTED LETTER (WORD DOC), EMAIL: kinshipcircle [at] accessus . net
Easily modify letter. Copy/paste it into an email or print letter to fax or mail.

FROM KINSHIP CIRCLE: In our UPDATES / AUG-OCT 2008 Newsletter for Kinship Circle Primary subscribers, we revealed the trial of notorious “Dogfighting Don” Floyd Boudreaux, 73, and his son Guy Boudreaux, 44 — arrested in 2005 (pre-Katrina) on 48 counts of dogfighting after Louisiana State Police seized 50+ pit bulls. Shockingly, the leaders of this dogfighting dynasty have since been CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES at their 10/15/08 trial!

Call for Action: Write letters!

===========================================================
FULL CONTACT INFORMATION. Sample letter follows. ===========================================================

Judge Kristian Earles, Division J
P.O. Box 1980 / Crowley, La. 70527
ph: 337-788-8811; fax: 337-783-2612
Secretary, Phyllis Thevis: phyllisthevis@hotmail.com
Law Clerk, Jackie Klein: jackieklein@cox-internet.com

Michael Harson, District Attorney
Ronald E. Dauterive, Assistant District Attorney
Fifteenth Judicial District Court
P. O. Box 3306 / Lafayette, LA 70502-3306
ph: 337-232-5170; fax: 337-235-1354
email: mharson@15thjdcda.org

===========================================================
SAMPLE LETTER — This letter is prepared to inform you about the issue. Try to shorten and personalize your letter before sending. ===========================================================

Honorable Judge Kristian Earles, DA Michael Harson and Assistant DA Ronald
E. Dauterive:

Conscientious citizens worldwide are shocked by the recent acquittal of “Dogfighting Don” Floyd Boudreaux, 73, and his son, Guy Boudreaux, 44.

Renowned in fight circuits, the Boudreaux dynasty bred dogs for optimum “gameness,” selling them at up to $10,000 a head. The Boudreaux line set the standard in dogs raised to fight to the death. Yet, Judge Earles granted a motion for acquittal based on the state’s failure to prove these men were even involved in this illegal blood sport.

I implore Louisiana courts to recognize the gravity of animal cruelty crimes and establish a better precedent for prosecuting them.

Both men were charged with animal cruelty and illegal possession of steroids and a sawed-off shotgun. When law enforcement agents raided their Broussard, Louisiana property in early March 2005, they recovered typical paraphernalia: Dogfight magazines, photos, videos, and surgical gear to mend combat wounds. The Boudreaux compound was outfitted with treadmills for forced runs and break sticks to pry apart a dog’s jaws. Authorities seized more than 50 pit bulls, their faces gashed in old fight scars.

Michael Vick’s case brought dogfighting into the dens of mainstream America, illuminating its inherent violence. But in Lafayette, Louisiana a state judge clears two men so entrenched in dogfighting, they were openly revered for their champion bloodlines and prolific fight circles.

This case needs to be reopened, with a better interpretation of the evidence, so that Floyd and Guy Boudreaux are prosecuted to the fullest extent under Louisiana animal fighting and cruelty laws. Anything less is a grave miscarriage of justice.

Sincerely,

Please take the time to copy and paste and rewrite this letter and email your friends and have them do the same. Send them a link to this web page and ask them to spread the word.


NO DOGS ON CHAINS

February 15, 2008

Should you keep a dog on a chain?

Dogs Deserve Better
Dogs Deserve Better

Know a dog living on a chain 24/7? Then please check out this website and send the owner’s one of this web site’s PDF letters anonymously. Thank you!

Youtube.com video: Don’t Chain your Dog http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMzfOvK5QFI or http://snipurl.com/4tanv

Puppy Picture, Spay and Neuter

Photo of a cute puppy that was homeless

Cute puppy

Hard to believe that people can acquire a puppy and then abuse it by making it live out its life on a chain. Please help educate the children so they will not grow up and do this too.